30 July 2006

Does God need Housing? Beth-El


above, l-r: crystal quartz, natural Asherim, verdant springs, grantite pillars - at our 3800 meter elevation in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, it is too easy to question why other human beings continue to believe that God needs affordable Housing - more Temples, Churches, Qubbas - (more male womb/room envies??). But for the curious, Beth-El (House of "God") of Jacob/Israel fame, may not be exactly what you thought--

from Genesis 28, v.18 "So Jacob rose early in the morning, and he took the stone that he had put under his head and set it up for a pillar and poured oil on the top of it. 19 He called that place Beth-El: 22 And this stone, which I have set up for a pillar, shall be God's house." Note to Gen 28.18 in the New Oxford Annotated RSV, 3rd Ed. 2001; states "Ancient Israelite local sanctuaries featured sacred pillars, perhaps signifying male powers of fertility (see v. 22; 31.13, 45-54; 35.14, 20)." [Ed: "perhaps"?!]

Who is "El"? From Encyclopædia Britannica, 2001- El (Semitic: "God"), the chief deity of the West Semites. In the ancient texts from Ras Shamra (ancient Ugarit) in Syria, El (El the Bull) was described as the titular head of the pantheon, husband of Asherah, and father of all the other gods (except for Baal). Although a venerable deity, he was not active in the myths, which primarily concerned his daughters and sons. He was usually visually portrayed as an old man with a long beard and, often, two wings. He was the equivalent of the Hurrian god Kumarbi and the Greek god Cronus. Writers of the [Hebrew Scriptures] used the word El both as a general term for "deity" and as a synonym for Yahweh.
© 1994-2001 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

27 July 2006

Answering Dimitris - Why Phallos, no Vulva?

Dear Dimitris-

Last July, you asked me, "How come you've suddenly shifted from vulva to phallus?" And two weeks ago, you asked "I can't help but note that you've taken a much greater interest lately (as far as I get to see things) in the Linga and his various manifestations in and from around the world ... whereas I've met you - originally - you were much more a "yoni man". Or was I deceived into thinking so by my own One-Pointed Attention? Seriously. There seems to be shift there. I'd like to know if my perception is right or wrong - or gray."

Dimitris, let me suggest four answers. This serves as a useful cathartic exercise and your recent question comes at an expected moment - I have reached the classic 55 year old point of the householder who can now answer such questions "without care". One point of correction, I have indeed moved, but only from Yoni to Yoni w/Penis and THEIR manifestations - I have yet not moved quite so far as the "Linga and His various manifestations" - nor do I expect to - see Answer 3 below.

ANSWER 1] SPECTACLE! In response to your invitation to write an "short" essay regarding veneration of the Vulva for Demetra's book, one must immediately ask "why does anyone need explaination to venerate the Yoni/vulva which is everyone's arrival terminal?" then, restated "what blocks/blinds everyone from seeing the obvious?" And when we slowly scratch our way back through time to humankind's first images - why, indeed, it was the Vulva (see S. Giedion's Eternal Present, Vol 1, pg 173ff as an example).

[Now to answer your questions, it is useful to be living in the United States at the time of George W. Bush - same question "what prohibits everyone from seeing the obvious?"]

Why?? SPIN vs SILENCE The yX male (in his confused attempts against the obvious yoni double X chroma superiority) SPINS huge spectacle and false promise- sufficent to satisfy his fears some of the time, maybe most of the time. Women in general quietly dismiss men's spectacle out of hand, but say nothing very loudly (not always from any fear, as women have all the actual power and wisdom, but) because the one thing that having actual power and wisdom does (non-attachment) is begat SILENCE, or if not silence, at least not Spectacle. This, as example, is why it is impossible to write an essay on Yoni veneration without revealing one's maleness and male limits - only a man would use words to create a devotional to a bleeding baby hole.

Next, Woman may very likely also be silent regarding the male spectacle because women reasonably lack any first hand knowledge or appreciation of the two principal entangled fears and envies of the yX male from whence "arise" the motivation for his Spectacle and attempts at compensation-

a) envy of woman's blood magic (moon, menses, making babies)- hence male motifs, myth and mentality requiring blood "sacrifice" including war - a part of a male immortality construct. No woman I have met can believe Menses are a point of male envy, but history and the present male blood letting prove otherwise.

b) phallic magic or lack thereof (aka re-erection, resurrection, "who is controlling whom" and/or, more precisely, "is this erection, my very last erection?") A woman, might have a headache, but she is still physically always able to engage in sex and more importantly, to continue her arousal and have repeated orgasms. Men can neither quickly re-engage nor readily have multiple orgasms. (On this point, see Mark Twain's Letters from Earth, Letter 8.)

The "blood envy" construct, I have begun to understand and have been attempting for some time to discuss in my essay, however the latter - "limited phallic magic", I am only now "wrestling" with (55 years old!) - which would no doubt gave "rise" to your observation of my appearance of phallic fixation.


ANSWER 2] THE TEACHER Remember the ancient saying?? "When the student is ready, the Teacher will appear."?? Perhaps true. The discovery that the first icon was the Vulva and that every present day religion, if you but scratch off about 3000 years of history, was controlled by women, not by men - was, for me - shattering. Yes, a "yoni man"! But at the moment, I am coming, Teacher, upon the motif named "phallos wrapped". Certainly my wanderings since my fortunate trip to Patmos have turned up keyhole after keyhole, motif after motif - each which has expanded into a universe after universe of both knowledge and has revealed earlier misinformation. Perhaps this "rabbit holes" of a Path is itself the expected Teacher? (You have certainly been the Bodhisattva to me - calling from the far shore.) But I carry heavy right-wing fundamentalist baggage, acquired before the age of ten (my sister says "before eight years old") which I cannot exhaust in the remainder of this natural life. You, Dimitris, I think, do not have such baggage - that is, your lightness is your advantage. As I identify each item of baggage, I must ask "what is it?", "where did it come aboard?", "where did/does it fit in the mix?, why should I mend it or toss it?" - BEFORE I can move on. This is an exercise of the FISH attempting to unlearn/describe WATER. A short list of the larger pieces of misguided fundamentalist baggage would be:

One Way - Univocation (ie, My Way or the Highway)
Servants of God (ie, the Almighty needs Your help)
Chosen People (ie, you are the OTHER, so I now I can kill you)
Holy Writ "People of the Book" (ie, Holy Words save you for all Eternity, words are NOT proscibed "images" Ex. 20.4ff)
No history, nor human culture (ie, we be leav'ng fo' heaven any day now!)
Linear time and progressive knowing (ie, Christians know more about God than Jews, Protestants more than Catholics, and I know more than you)
God gives Money to the Holy Ones (ie, the poor are sinners)
AND MORE - stay tune in this space - but said much better than I - Chris Floyd's recent article.

ANSWER 3] ÉGALITÉ! The very very few women who have be kind enough to wade into my tirade - "Cantos Cunnus" - have commented that woman give men/phallos much more credit than do I. And that a truely oppressive Matriachy/Yoni could never exist (except among the leather ladies of your homeland), because if men were to relax their Patriarchy / Phallos, things would only come up to EQUAL - ie, women are not so stupid as to create the opposite of a Patriarchy. This is an opinion expressed by the authors in a number of books by women as well as Leonard Schlain' several tomes. This being the case, one could only move from Yoni to Yoni Around Phallos as a move towards balance - "Penis only" would be a step too far.

ANSWER 4] NO LOCAL YONI You may be correct that I have edged towards the Phallos even if wrapped in virtual vulva - but this past year or more your Yoni acolyte has not had the stablising influence of a willing point of devotion. Again, when the Teacher appears and when She disappears - this too is the Path.

Amen, Amen!

Who is Asher'ah? Part Two: The Object


Fanciful woodcut above shows Hebrews worshipping the Sun, Moon and stars atop four aniconic Asherim. This blog will sooner or later get to a more probable iteration.

Citation compiled from Encyclopædia Britannica-

The word Asherah (Ashera, Asherim [plural]) in the [Hebrew Scripture] was used not only in reference to the goddess herself but also to indicate a wooden cult object associated with her worship. Prior to the conquest of Canaan (Palestine) by the Israelites in the 12th-11th century BC, the high places (Hebrew BAMAH, OR BAMA, Israelite or Canaanite open-air shrine usually erected on an elevated site) served as shrines of the Canaanite fertility deities, the Baals (Lords) and the Asherot (Semitic goddesses). In addition to an altar, matztzevot (stone pillars representing the presence of the divine) and asherim (upright wooden poles symbolizing the female deities) often were erected on the high places, which sometimes were located under a tree or grove of trees.

Because the Israelites had associated the divine presence with elevated places (e.g., Mount Sinai), they used Canaanite high places to worship their own God, Yahweh. Canaanite agricultural fertility rites and practices were adopted by the previously nomadic Israelites, often in a syncretic fashion with Yahweh replacing Baal. A strong reaction to the adoption of such rites led to protests by Israelite judges and prophets from the 12th to the late 7th century BC, when the Deuteronomic Reform of 621 bce led to the extirpation of the many local high places which included stone pillars, wooden Asherim and altars as sites of worship.
© 1994-2001 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

from Edward Carpenter, 1914: As to the Asherah, or sometimes plural Asherim, translated "grove,"--for which the women wove hangings--the most generally accepted opinion is that it was a wooden post or tree stripped of its branches and planted in the ground beside an altar, whether of Jehovah or other gods. Several biblical passages, like Jeremiah ii. 27, suggest that it was an emblem of Baal or of the male organ, and others (e.g., Judges ii. 13, and iii. 7) connect it with Ashtoreth, the female partner of Baal; while the weaving of hangings or garments for the "grove" suggests the combination of female with male in one effigy. At any rate we may conclude pretty safely that the thing or things had a strongly sexual signification.

Intermediate Types among Primitive Folk by Edward Carpenter, pg 34 [1914] LONDON GEORGE ALLEN & Co. LTD

And BEST article in the internet on Asher'ah and Her connections is Asphodel Long's "Asherah, the Tree of Life and the Menorah : Continuity of a Goddess symbol in Judaism?" presented in 1996 at the College of St. Mark & St. John, Plymouth, UK [w/ excellent bibliography!) I would only add to Ms. Long's connections the Priestly redactor's concerns re: Aaron's blooming Rod and other "power" staffs which populate the Hebrew Scripture.

Two excellent books on this question are:
Patai, Raphael The Hebrew Goddess. Wayne Univ. Press Detroit 1990 isbn: 0814322719
Hadley, J. M. The Cult of Asherah in Ancient Israel and Judah- Evidence for a Hebrew Goddess. Cambridge Univ. Press 1997 isbn: 0521662354

29 June 2006

"Sacred Vessels" BENEATH Posts, Page Six



Above, l-r: Buddhist hand-bell; Schoolmarm's Bell c. 1930; bottle of Courvoisier; Capital Building, Denver, Colorado; Bodnath Stupa, Kathmandu

Now we turn our rancher's boot atop the fence post on its head, tip the wine glass upside down-

From Robert Beer, 1999 “The ritual hand-bell or vajra ghanta (Tib. rdo rje drilbu) ... [incorporate] the two main ritual [Buddhist] implements that symbolise the perfections of method or skilful means (vajra), and wisdom or emptiness (ghanta). As a sexual symbol, the hollow 'lotus' of the bell represents emptiness as the vagina, and the prongs of the vajra - symbolising the four nadi which emanate from the 'jewel-wheel chakra' at the tip of the male sexual organ- represent form or appearance. When paired [ed: separated], the vajra is held in the right hand, and the bell in the left, representing the inseparable union of method and wisdom. Their union is the coincidence of great bliss and compassion as pure emptiness and form.”

citation: Robert Beer, The Encyclopedia of Tibetan Symbols and Motifs, Shambhala (1999) ISBN: 157062416X, page 243

Symbolism for the stupa

18 June 2006

"Sacred Vessels" ATOP Posts, Page Five



From Linda O'Keeffe, 1996 "In 16th-century Venice, shoes called chopines (right above) placed women's feet on platforms that frequently rose to unprecedented heights of 30 inches or more. Venetian husbands reputedly introduced the heavy wooden chopines to prevent their wives from straying.

"Manchu women (left above, late 19th century) with unbound feet wore shoes on pedestals to imitate the mincing "Lotus foot" step admired by Chinese men. The stilt-like bases were made from sewn layers of starched cotton."

Citations: Words and photos from "Shoes - A Celebration of Pumps, Sandals, Slippers & More" by Linda O'Keeffe, Workman Publishing, New York 1996

"Sacred Vessels" ATOP Posts, Page Four



Above: "Roger Federer became the third player in the Open era to capture four successive Wimbledon tennis championships" -NYTimes.com, July 11, photo: Gerry Penny/European Pressphoto Agency

Below: Geoff Ogilvy kisses his "Loving Cup" trophy, US Open, June 18th, photo: Barton Silverman/NY Times

From Silver Gallery- "Loving Cup Trophy acquired its name from the English. In hopes of enhancing the chances of good crops or health, it was customary to sip spiced beverages from a bowl passed from person to person. Each would kiss the vessel which came to be known as the Loving Cup."

(In case, you thought I was making this stuff up.)

16 June 2006

Evening Koans


The flowered tree is not well hidden.
That shorn, stands between.

Avoid their noisy markings.
Our Paraclete, quiet Chaos.

14 June 2006

Speak! O! Sphinx!



It would be well if the males' compensations - for their lack of connection with Nature; for any obvious continuation beyond death (as women have through birth giving); and for fear of life itself - would simply stop with his invented symbols, written language, wars and religions - BUT he does not stop there - instead he immediately HIDES, whatever his latest invented compensation, inside a somewhat literal inversion of the “Pandora’s Box” mythos.

That is, the male hides that latest paradigm – enclosing all his evil inside the Box - and then he EXCLUDES Pandora and her sisters from seeing what new inventions are inside His SPECIAL box. If we apply the logic - "if smoke, then fire" – that is, if the evidence is first observed that there is now a blatant exclusion of women from the latest male construct, then we may conclude that there is a new paradigm defining one of man’s latest false compensations against death and his fear of living.

As possible examples-
If no female teachers; then education and alphanumeric systems are a false male compensation.
If no female priests; then religions, abstract belief systems are. . . .
If no female doctors; then study of medicine and life sciences are. . .
If no female vote; then government, borders, land boundaries are. .
If no female lawyers; then law systems, corporations, last wills and testaments
If no female soldiers; then wars and implements of war,
If no female inquisitors; then sin, guilt, evil, Devils
If no female competitors; then team sports, races, race cars
If no actresses (kabuki, Shakespeare, Greek); then theater, politics
If no female brotherhoods; then secret societies, fraternities
If no female name givers (nominclators); then naming names, patronyms (male surnames), sacred divine names (“in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost”); honorifics, titles, magic incantations– (cf: Egypt: Hekau below.)

In all, one aweful Tool Box of futile and failed wonders.

Interestingly, one learns with little study that most or all of these constructs mentioned above are not even male inventions, but rather direct robberies from Pandora- as example, from RC Camphausen: “incantations or magic words = the Egyptian “hekau” (from Hekat - Egyptian toad-headed goddess of birth) comes from the Thracian Goddess Hecate (“older than Zeus and Osiris”) who is the archetypal high goddess of magic (her name means “Extending Her Will from Afar”). In this sense then, perhaps “Words of Power” (hekau/magic) do not necessarily/always have to be male-made.”

13 June 2006

More "Sacred Vessels" high ATOP Posts



There appear to be four coital motifs which meander in and out of popular and sacred culture - this oversimplification is somewhat new ground, so we are inventing language/names which will no doubt change as we blog along-

a] "trophy" - more or less equal parts male and female "attributes" which we see above, ie "shoe-in-post"; "Holy Grail"; "bell/ghanta",;

b] "holly wreath" - the vulvic circle made up of phallic parts, ie "crown of thorns"; "ring of keys"

c] "flowered rod" - the phallic wrapped with various female "attributes", probably our anathemic "asher'ah" object.

d] "axis mundi" - more a virtual "pole" around which dynamically turns the "feminine" aspect, ie female earth turning on its male axis or the ziggurat or "Tower of Babel" winding up vertically to the heavens

This post begins the first category- "trophy", then follow through the other three motifs.

From ARAS Online: "The ankh or crux ansata - the sign of life - has the form of a looped knotted cross. As a syllable, this hieroglyph is the root of no less than twenty four words. Of these, Brugsch (cited by Giedion) lists fourteen which retain the original sense of the root: to have existence, to renew existence, to will into existence. Other meanings include those of 'eye' and 'ear' which divert in meaning to that of opening. Winthius (cited by Giedion) observes that the picture of an opening or an eye is recognized by some ethnologists as a picture of the vulva."

"Giedion believes that the Egyptian sign of life may be related to the prehistoric fertility symbols of vulva and phallus, the upper part corresponding to the Aurignacian symbol for the vulva, combined with an abstraction of the phallus, yielding in combination a symbol of androgyny, of the eternal renewal of procreation, of the magic power inherent in the union of male and female."

"In early Christian times, the ankh was modified by Egyptian Christians into the Coptic cross."

credit: ARAS Online [online archive] Record No. 2Ac.008, New York: The Archive for Research in Archetypal Symbolism; available from www.aras.org; accessed 15 June 2006.

Citations mentioned by ARAS:
The Eternal Present: The Beginnings Of Art.
S.Giedion, Pantheon Books. Bollingen Series XXXX\V 6.1, 1962. pp.120,231,233.

The Eternal Present: The Beginnings of Architecture
Giedion, S. Pantheon Books, 1964., pp.89-93.

More about the related popular images of Christmas stocking /candy cane and wine glass - or do you already see where we are headed??

Who is Asher'ah? Part One: The Goddess



Photos above: left, Asher'ah, detail from an ivory box from Minat al-Bayda' near Ras Shamra, Syria, c. 1300bce; in the Louvre, Paris; right, Astarte, with Lotus blossum, Canaan, 3000-2000bce; Israel Museum(IDAM), Jerusalem - see John Singer Sargent's wonderful Astarte in Boston Library.

Against who did the Yahwist prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures rail (Judges 6.25-32; 1 Kings 16.32,33, Ezekiel 8.1-18)? And what was her wooden aniconic image which they repeatedly "broke, cut, hewed, burned and uprooted" (2 Kings 23; 2 Chron 31.1,34.4,7)? First, the goddess - Part Two: The Object.

Drawing from the several citations in the hopefully "neutral" Encyclopædia Britannica , here is what we can easily learn of Asherah (aka- Astarte of Phoenicia, Ishtar of Akkadia, Inanna of Sumeria, Aphrodite of Cyprus, Hathor/Isis of Eygpt, cf: Tara of present day Tibet ). (Why say "neutral"? - a] remember that history, as well as religions and law were written by yesterday's victors and that b] today's fundamentalist believers "of the Book[s]" still avoid any competitive mythos - then, it is best, if possible, to find neutral playing fields.)

From the EB: Asher'ah (or Ashtoreth) was an ancient West Semitic goddess and consort of the supreme god, El (cf: Beth-El). Her full name was probably "She Who Walks in the Sea," but she was also called "Holiness," and, occasionally, Elath, "the Goddess." According to the texts discovered at Ugarit (modern Ras Shamra, Syria) in 1929, by a French archaeological mission under the direction of Claude F.A. Schaeffer, Asher'ah was the mother of 70 gods by her consort, El. She is also called simply Qudshu, "Holiness." Asherah is associated with the sea and with serpents. As mother goddess she was widely worshiped throughout Syria and Palestine, although she was frequently paired with Baal, who often took the place of El in practical cult; as Baal's consort, Asherah was usually given the name Baalat.

Many Ugaritic texts reveal an older Canaanite mythology. A tablet names the Ugaritic pantheon with Babylonian equivalents; El, Asherah of the Sea, and Baal were the main deities. These texts not only constitute a literature of high standing and great originality but also have an important bearing on Old Testament studies. It is now evident that the patriarchal stories in the Old Testament were not merely transmitted orally but were based on written documents of Canaanite origin, the discovery of which at Ugarit has led to a new appraisal of the Old Testament.

According to the Hebrew Bible, Asherah and Astarte were both worshiped in Israel during the first half of the 1st millennium bce, and Hebrew inscriptions attest to a pairing of Yahweh and Asherah. Up to the time of King Josiah's reform (621 BC) there was a women's cult of Asherah (under qedeshim auspices [consecrated for fertility practices], according to 2 Kings 23:7) in the Jerusalem [ed: aka Solomon's] Temple. The qedsha was one of a class of sacred prostitutes found throughout the ancient Middle East, especially in the worship of the fertility goddess Astarte (Ashtoreth). These prostitutes, who often played an important part in official temple worship, could be either male or female. Although Israelite prophets and reformers repeatedly denounced sacred prostitution, the early Israelites seem to have adopted the local Canaanite rites, which they apparently practiced publicly until the reform of King Josiah about 622 BC.

Asherah's Hebrew devotees considered her the chief wife of Yahweh, even as she was the wife of El, head of the Canaanite pantheon, for in the Bible El is identified with Yahweh. But Josiah eliminated the cult of Asherah, and official Judaism has since then left no place for other gods, which meant the elimination of every goddess. Popular religion, to be sure, persisted in the female fertility principle until the destruction of the Temple in 586 BC. In Judaean excavations Astarte figurines were found in private homes down to that time. Further purification of the Hebrew religion, which was intensified by the catastrophe of 586, put an end to the practice of pagan fertility rites, including the use of goddess figurines. Without goddesses there could be no sexual activity in the pantheon, and thus Judaism has developed without a divine mother figure.

Copyright © 1994-2001 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

09 June 2006

Bush's "Marriage Amendment"

Mr. Bush, the good Christian leader of the free world is at it again this week, to get out the vote this fall among his Christian "core". For the second time, he uses the word "marriage" with the word "gay" - as such oxymorons brings out the lexic folks en masse. For us, dyslexics, "civil union" are the right words. Both sides should put down the word "marriage", especially Christians who rarely read their Book and have no idea of what their founding "father" has been said to have said about "marriage"- for your interest:

First, Christianity was to have been a high speed, short term, SINGLE generational (Matt. 24.15-21, 34) escape strategy from the tainted planet Earth for the “chosen” people - no marriage assembly required - we would be "as the angels" (Matt. 22.30). The shackles of family and earthly concerns were to be thrown down (Matt. 10.34-37, 1 John 1.15-17). St. Paul suggested celibacy (1 Cor. 7.1-7). Jesus recommended much, much worse (Matthew 19.11,12)- "Not all men can receive this precept, but. . .there are eunuchs, who have made themselves eunuchs, for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this, let him receive it." Ouch! John the Revelator allowed that the 144,000 saints who surround Christ “the Lamb” on the heavenly Mount Sion “were not defiled with women” (Revelation 14.4). Defiled by women?

"Christian marriage" is the oyxmoron.

04 June 2006

Why are the boots on fence posts? Answer:



We are considering symbols winding in and out of the sacred and mundane. What motivates the rancher to place boots on fence posts? Do you see any similarity between the boots atop the posts and two images that follow? - the shoe-WITH-a-post stiletto and the yonilingam - Shiva's "post" and Pavarti's "shoe"?

Perhaps some background is helpful - Freud suggests that the shoe is the symbol of female genitalia ("Symbolism in Dreams", in Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Tr. and Ed. James Strachey, Hogarth Press, London 1963, vol.XV, p.158 ). And that the foot is a penis substitute (Freud, "Symbolism in Dreams", in op.cit., pp.155-6). So, does the rancher, consciously or unconsciously, create a coital symbol - vagina atop penis - down miles of country lanes?

But to my growing right-wing Protestant "family", physicians that went on to become psychiatrists were Anathema, little better than the Devil Incarnate. Very well.  Let's turn to 3000 year old Holy Writ - where the feet, legs and thighs are also used as equivalent phallic "euphemisms" to avoid mentioning the extra frightening name of the male reproductive organ itself (just as the Hebrews avoided the name of their monodeity) - as example - after Moses received his divine commission at the Burning Bush to go before the Pharaoh seeking the release the Hebrews, the same all-knowing "Lord" tries to kill Moses because he turns out to be uncircumcised (Ex. 4.24ff). But his quick thinking wife, Zipporah, cuts off the foreskin of her son and touches Mose's "feet" with the bloody foreskin, saying "Truly you are a bridegroom of blood by circumcision to me!" So the Lord spares Moses' life. Commentary says (NRSV 3rd ed), "'Feet', a euphemism for the genitals (see Isa 7.20)". (Never heard this story, I'll bet.)

OK, Isaiah 7.20 reads "On that day the Lord will shave. . .the head and the hair of the feet, and will take off the beard as well" refering to shaming of prisoners. Shave the "hair of the feet"? Or Jacob (Israel) tells son, Joseph, to make an oath by putting "your hand under my thigh and promise to deal loyally and truly with me" (Genesis 47.29). Similar "euphemisms" are used in Greek myths of a birth-giving male Gods, such as Kumarbi begats the the West Wind from his "thigh" or Zeus who gives birth to Dionysus from his "thigh" / aka penis.

The words, "testament" and "testify" come from the same root meaning as "testicle" - that is, one made an oath by placing your hand over something more precious than your mother's grave! From the knee (penis??) or "genu" comes "genuflect" - to bend the knee in worship. YHWH's covenant with Abraham, father of the Hebrews and Arabs, needed something more than a flexible penis, it required an oath signed with the blood of circumcision (Gen. 17.9-14) - 99 year old Abraham, his 13 year old son, Ishmael and all his male slaves were so "covenanted" on the same day. (Menstrual envy is here suspected by some scholars.)

So, if foot = penis, then boot = vagina. Atop a country fence post?

Still not convinced? Freud and Holy Writ not enough? On the back cover of Barbara Walker's book "The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets" isbn 006250925x, she asks "Why was Cinderella's glass slipper so important to the Prince?" Her answer, pg 168- "Beautified with her new riches, Cinderella won the Prince . . . Their union was symbolized by fitting her foot into a shoe, a common sexual allegory." Need more? From Robert Graves, "Greek Myths: 1" paper isbn 0140010262, pg 94 "Demeter's ecstatic initiates [celebrating the Eleusinian ('advent') Mysteries - 1500bce to 396ad] symbolically consummated Demeter's love afair with Zeus in an inner recess of the shrine by working a phallic object up and down a woman's top-boot;" this being "the temple of she who rages in a lurking place." Yet more? Charles Panati's Extraordinary Origins of Everyday Things, Harper 1987, isbn 0060960930, pgs 26,27 "Today old shoes are tied to newlyweds' car and no one asks why. Originally, shoes were only one of many objects tossed at a bride to wish her a bounty of children. In fact, shoes were prefered over the equally traditional rice and wheat because from ancient times the foot was a powerfully phallic symbol [Ed: Panati fails to state the obvious converse - that the shoe was therefore a powerful vulvic symbol]. In several cultures, particularly among the Eskimos, a woman experiencing difficulty in conceiving was instructed to carry a piece of an old shoe with her at all times."

Does a fence post within a boot then equals "hard core xxx" farmer symbolism? Makes certain fetishes easier to understand. More comments to come on other "sacred vessels" high atop (or beneath) poles in this obsession to discover the proletariat's "Asher'ah".

31 May 2006

...for the letter kills, but the spirit giveth life.

To: letters@nytimes.com

To the Editor,

Re "Moses' Top Ten
By SARAH VOWELL
Published: July 16, 2005

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/16/opinion/16vowell.html

Aside the greater question of keeping Caesars and Gods in separate corners, Christians intent to affix "Ten Commandments" in American government venues (or anywhere else) should reread its second command which proscribes "graven images" (Exodus 20.4). Twenty ton granite monuments featuring the Ten Commandments would certainly qualify as "graven images" as well as "lithographs" (stone writings) hung on walls - in homes or in court houses. (The point was that any image is forbidden which substitutes attention, to any degree, from the invisible Divinity! - do we need to draw you a picture? or will WORDS suffice? [trick question])

The prophet Jeremiah (Jer. 31.31ff, cf: Heb. 8.6-13) stated that "the days will come that (the Lord) will make a NEW COVENANT, not according to the covenant...made with their Fathers...out of Egypt, but a covenant (He) will...write in their hearts." Well, this has not happened yet - in 2900 years.

This echoed by the apostle Paul (2 Corinthians 3.6,2 NRSV)that "God has made us competent to be ministers of a NEW COVENANT - written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tables of stone, but on tablets of human hearts - for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life." Still, not happening yet - 1960 years later.

As water is to fish, WORDS (yes, words!) themselves are the very invisible "graven idols" of bigots. (One does well to read ones own Book!)

29 May 2006

Woman Clothed with the Sun: Study for an Icon

Who is she that looks forth like the dawn, fair as the moon, bright as the sun, terrible as an army with banners? Song of Solomon 6.10

"And a great portent appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; she was with child and she cried out in her pangs of birth, in anguish for delivery. (Revelation 12:1,2) . . .She brought forth a male child, . . . but the child was caught up to God and his throne." (Revelation 12: 5) . . .the woman was given the wings of the great eagle that she might fly . . . into the wilderness." (Revelation 12:14)

21 December 1995

Alkmini Karavis
SPIRIT OF BYZANTIUM
Agias Lesvias Square
85500 Hora, Patmos GREECE

Dear Ms. Karavis,

Perhaps you remember me during the 1900th Anniversary Celebration of the writing of the Apokalypsis (the last book of the Christian "New Testament", also called "The Revelation of St. John") this past September - an American with a tall Greek friend from Athens [really, from Volos]. We returned several times during the week, but did not find you again. You mentioned that you would accept a commission to create an icon. Please accept the following request and the enclosed payment of 85,000 drachmas. I will leave the quality and size of the icon to your judgment.

Icon by Alkmini Karavis
I realize, in my brief study of eastern orthodox iconography, that the believer holds that the first icons "are made without hands" and that the iconographer only replicates that original image without attaching any of his or her own personality. Thus, I hope that to commission an icon [and, I suppose, your accepting a commission] is not too much a secular idea that would offend the devote iconographer. I wish to illustrate the image of the Woman of Revelation 12. I believe it is she who connects us with the sacred images of the feminine from prehistory with those many images and apparitions [some 21,000+] since John's vision on Patmos. I have quoted parts of the English text of the Apokalypsis [from the Revised Standard Version] and will make specific graphic requests with personal comments. I have attached copies of other such art as might assist the artist as a starting point.

Comments regarding the image of the icon and its parts -

a] the woman should be shown descending from the heavens so her "clothes of the sun" would appear weightless and floating. The "sun" light surrounds her transparently with her features nearly, or completely, covered in "light". Perhaps the aurora borealis, or similar, surrounds her head.

b] the moon should be shown at crescent, not the full moon as some attached images show. This is my graphic preference (and consistent to the new moon of Artemis, Inanna and other prehistoric images.)

c] The crown of twelve stars should be literally "twelve stars". Some writers and artists have made "twelve stars" into images of the twelve signs of the zodiac, or the twelve apostles or the twelve patriarchs. Perhaps the stars are small shooting stars more like the arrows of huntress Artemis (see below). (I particularly like the attached ER Hughes' painting, "Night with her Train of Stars" where the ". . .Stars" are children.)

d] The woman should be shown very pregnant, in the midst of her "anguish for delivery", the child about to be born, with one hand over and the other hand under her belly- very reasonably, she is probably not exactly standing "with the moon under her feet".

e] Some later images show the woman holding the baby as if Madonna and Christ Child, an idea especially popular in Northern Europe during the 15th century, apparently part the Mariology that accompanied the so-called "counter Reformation". (Compare with the the image of Our Lady of Guadeloupe, Mexico, at a similar time frame of 1531). This is certainly not the image of John's dream - the child is taken directly to "God and his throne", and the mother escapes the Dragon to the wilderness where she has even more offspring (Rev. 12.17) - this mother never holds her child.

Captions below.  Here: 2, 3.1, 3.2

f] The wings of the eagle are not given to the woman until after the birth of her son to help her escape from the Dragon into the wilderness. Graphically I prefer the wings to be near by - ready for attachment, not yet attached. I suggest the four wings as Ezekiel's eagle faced cherubim [Ezekiel 1] and also note Ezekiel 17's "great eagle with great wings, long winged, full of feathers, which had divers colors.." [verse 3]. As the wings are not yet attached, they might be used as purely graphic elements - in the corners or as borders, perhaps swirling around the woman - to symbolize the four corners of the earth or the four winds [Rev. 7:1]. The wings might be in the four colors of the Four Horsemen of Revelation 6 - white, red, black and pale - together with gold as if drawn by Klimt.

g] The wilderness - harsh, mountainous, rough, stony - should be shown in the lower third of the image. I think the Fortress-Monastery of St. John, its hills and surrounding would be perfect. [Note: Ms. Karavis chose the view of the sea from the Cave of the Apokalypsis that is the traditional writing place of the Book of Revelation.]

h] Background to image might be dark blue at the top graduating to light as in an early morning sunrise.

4.1, 4.2, 5.1, 5.2

Personal comments and background information, based on as yet, a very superficial study -

1] Contrary to my impression (raised as a fundamentalist American Protestant), the island of Patmos in John's time was not a deserted isle for Rome's exiles, but a populated mid-point of active Mediterranean sea trade with at least 4000 inhabitants. Within 20 minutes walk of John's Cave of the Apokalypsis was an important Temple to Artemis (complete with priestesses?), which was destroyed in 1088 AD by monks to built the summit site of the present Fortress-Monastery of St. John.

According to the inscription in marble in the Monastery's museum, this was specifically a Scythian or Tauropolos Artemis. Perhaps the chief Scythian goddess, Tabiti-Hestia, patroness of wild beasts as was Artemis. A very short distance from island of Patmos was the city of Ephesus in what is now Turkey, the place of John's death, which was the center of worship to Artemis [the Roman Diana] (Acts 19.23-40 ) and where, curiously, Mary was declared THEOTOKOS ("Mother of God" or "God-Bearer") at Pope Celestine I's Council of Ephesus in 431 AD. (The Temple of Artemis in Ephesus was rediscovered in 1869.) Artemis was the "goddess of the new moon, of wilderness, its animals, a huntress and - though herself a virgin without a children - the patroness of childbirth; - according to Euripides (Hippolytus, 165-8) "I cried out for Artemis in heaven, who loves the hunt and whose care relieves those giving birth". The statue of Artemis in Ephesus shows her with the multiple breasts to nourish her many "offspring". Artemis is most often depicted with eagle wings and her wild animals. Our woman of Revelation 12 is "in her pangs of birth" and her eagles' wings take her to the wilderness where she has even more offspring. Also compare with the "Lilith" of the Jewish Torah and of earlier Sumerian myths, who as Adam's first wife, taking umbrage to the recumbent position he demanded, uttered the ineffible Name of God, flew on (Owl's) wings to the wilderness, where she gives birth to hundreds of demonic offspring daily (see picture).

2] Patmos is located near to the Cyclades island group. Apparently Patmos has had very little modern archeology (my friend and I did climbed the Kastelli hill - finding 2000 year old pottery shards covering the summit), but it is certainly possible that figurines similar to the many found in the burial plots of nearby Cyclades Islands could well be present on Patmos.

3] I think is would be best that this icon be painted by a woman iconographer, either native of, or living on, the Island of Patmos. She should have the broadest understanding of the universality of the revealed images of divinity or, a better English [and Greek] word, the "epiphany" - ineffable divinity manifest in an concrete image - this I think is the reason for creating an icon. Familiarity with the Symbolist and Pre-Raphaelite movements in the 19th century might be useful.

With all this madness, I leave the icon in your good hands. From the poet Yeats -

Once out of nature I shall never take
My bodily form from any natural thing,
But such a form as Grecian goldsmiths make
Of hammered gold and gold enamelling
To keep a drowsy Emperor awake;
Or set upon a golden bough to sing
To lords and ladies of Byzantium
Of what is past, or passing, or to come.

Warm regards, Gary Regester

6.1, 6.2, 7.1, 7.2
13 March 1996

Alkmini Karavis
Spirit of Byzantium
Patmos HELLAS

Thank you for the fax. Good to learn you have received my packet. I thought I might not hear from you until summer.

I think you understand my request very well. There is no hurry. I understand that ICONS are "not made by human hands". So let your thoughts grow and take their own path. Since my visit to Patmos and re-reading the Apocalypse, I see that this woman is a wonderful bridge described by John on Patmos which connects the spiritual epiphanies before the coming of Christianity with those epiphanies of today and of the future. I agree that she is unclothed and surrounded by the sun or sunlight. And that the image includes the ideas of the 2nd Chakra, the waxing and waning moon, etc. etc. I look forward to your sketch and explanation. Further to Ezekiel's angels with the eagle's face and four wings, John also has the same idea in Revelation 4:7,8 which I overlooked, "and the fourth living creature like a flying eagle. . . with six wings about him. . .never ceases to sing, 'Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was and is and is to come!" This creature announces the pale horseman of Death (Rev. 6:7). So two, four or perhaps six eagles wings around our lady.

Certainly, the mythology surrounding the divine feminine is a 20,000 to 30,000 year old spiritual epiphany that connects human, animal and plant existence. All who are women-born well know that "holy Matrix" during our first years of life. Memories of which are quickly eclipsed by the newer 4000 year old "us vs them, sky god" cosmology, accompanied by its necessary warrior cult, that disconnects us from each other and the earth. Given the resultant and accelerating destruction of both human life and the earth, the return to this earlier mythology is deserving of further and more serious consideration.

Warm regards,

Gary Regester (I have added some general background information to the original letters.)

8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 9.1, 9.2

Images by panel and number from left to right - 1. Icon by Ms. Karavis, 1997; 2. Detail in frame, portable icon on the screen of the katholikon of St. John the Evangelist in the Fortress-Monastery of St. John on the island of Patmos; 3.1 The Virgin on the Crescent with a Crown of Stars, Albrecht Duerer, 1508, note the "man in the moon" detail; 3.2 The Madonna Appears to St. John, by Albrecht Duerer, 1511; 4.1 Die Jungfrau der Apokalypse, von Flammen umgeben, Malerei vom Meister des Hausbuches von Wolfegg, second half of the 15 Century, Museum Unterlinden, Colmar; 4.2 Virgin of the Apocalypse, Workshop of the Master of the Amsterdam Cabinet , Germany, 1480-90, The Cloisters, Metropolitan Museum of Art, NYC; 5.1 Woman and the Red Dragon, William Blake, 1805, National Gallery, D.C.; 5.2 The Glorification of the Virgin, Geertgen tot Sint Jans, ca. 1480, Museum Boymans-van Beuningen, Rotterdam; 6.1 Madonna, Holz-Plastik, 1675, Dom, Erfurt, Germany; 6.2 Our Lady of Guadeloupe, Mexico, 1531; 6.2 Venus of Laussel, Dordogne, 20,000 BC, Musee d'Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France; 7.2 Sumerian "Lilith", ca. 2000 BC, British Museum; 8.1 Female Figure of Late Spedos Type, Early Cycladic II, ca. 2400 BC, JP Getty Museum, Los Angeles; 8.2 Artemis and her lion, c. fifth century BC, British Museum; 8.3 Die schoene Artemis from the Temple of Artemis, Ephesus, Selchuk Museum, Turkey; 9.1 Prayer card of the Miraculous Medal modeled on the visions of Catherine Laboure, 1830, note the Virgin stands upon a serpent, but it is the earth, not the moon; 9.2 from the book, Apokalypse of John, by Antones Murodias, 1995, Patmos, Greece; 10. ER Hughes' painting, "Night with her Train of Stars", 1912, Birmingham City Museum, UK;

10
References:
"The Myth of the Goddess", by Anne Baring and Jules Cashford, Viking (Penguin) 1991;
"The Civilization of the Goddess", by Marija Gimbutas, Harper Collins, 1991
"The Language of the Goddess", by Marija Gimbutas, Harper Collins, 1989
"Alone of All Her Sex", by Marina Warner, Vintage (Random House) "Answer to Job", by Carl Jung, Princeton University Press, 2012
1983







28 May 2006

Why does the rancher put boots on fence posts?




The good Frater Holme's raison d’être is to physically demonstrate the premise (theorem) that "sacred" symbols so peculate into [and out of] mundane and profane everyday objects; that such phenomena / relationships refute both Protestantism' literalism [univocation, i.e., "my way or the highway"] AND Catholic scholasticism; "both which are exterminators of symbolism" [Norman O. Brown, "Love's Body", 1966, pg 199]; meaning that there is no escape from the overwhelming superiority of symbolism mediating within the human psyche - "put down your weapons [words, idols and other third party meditations] and step away from your [expensive] vehicle!" "For the letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life." 2 Cor 3.6   Cf Carl Jung's "Numinosum".

Patmos, the Island of the Apocalypse




This unlearning project begins with a visit with my friend, Babis Alexandrou, to the island of Patmos in 1995 during the Eastern Orthodox celebration of the 1900th anniversary of the writing of the Book of the Apocalypse, commonly called "Revelation" by St. John the Divine. John was said to have been exiled by the emperor Domitian (81-96 ce) on a deserted desert island of Patmos. However, Patmos was hardly a deserted island. In 95 ce, the island was a maritime trading point between Asia Minor and Europe with at least 4000 inhabitants and one of the largest temples to the asian goddess Artemis (Diana) - complete with officiating hierodulic priestesses - located outside of the cult center of Artemis, the seaport city of Ephesus, only some 55 miles away - see Acts 19.24-35. This temple was about 20 minutes walk from the grotto where John and his disiple, Prochorus, are said to have been writing their Revelations. In 1088ce, the temple was destroyed by the Orthodox monk, Hosios Christodoulous of Latra. On its ruins, Christodoulous built the present fortress- monastery (below - more of my Patmos photos).

This changes everything. John the Divine could have said, "Prochorus, I'm exhausted by dictating this dream. You tidy up some of the syntax. I met a priestess in the bar last night - see you in a couple of days." Time to re-read the Book of Revelation - especially the references to women - especially, to the Artemis-related woman clothed with the sun, standing on the moon, about to give birth, fighting a dragon - who features in the twelfth chapter - as her story is the inversion of the pre-existing Greek myth of the twins, Apollo (sun) and his sister, Artemis (moon) killing the she-dragon, Python, because the dragon attacked their mother, Leto, while they were invitro. Strange Christian window into "pagan" feminine mythos. Something, no protestant preacher ever preached at me.










27 May 2006

Solstice in Avebury, 2005 ce





An accidental "holyday" following a week's work last June at the Venice Biennale 2005 found me in Avebury Circle - geographical center of England (how did they know?) - on June 21, summer solstice - me and lots of the Goddesses' children - Silbury Hill in the distance, from atop the West Kennet Long Barrow.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...